Reviewers play a critical role in maintaining the scholarly quality, integrity, and credibility of the Xpertno International Journal of Interdisciplinary Research (XIJIR). We adhere to the highest standards of ethical and academic peer review:

 

Criteria for Reviewer Selection

Reviewers are carefully selected to ensure scholarly rigour and subject alignment. Each manuscript is typically reviewed by two senior experts and one early-career researcher. The inclusion of early-career reviewers is intended to support the development of future academic leaders while maintaining high standards.

Reviewers are selected based on the following criteria:

• Subject Expertise: Demonstrated knowledge and experience in the manuscript’s thematic or methodological area.
• Academic Contribution: A record of publications in reputable, peer-reviewed journals in relevant disciplines.
• Ethical Independence: No conflicts of interest or recent collaborations with the manuscript’s authors.
• Balanced Participation: Early-career researchers with a solid academic foundation and publication record are included to ensure fresh perspectives and foster inclusivity in peer review.
• Diversity and Representation: Attention is given to reviewer diversity across gender, geography, and institutional background, reflecting the journal’s interdisciplinary and global outlook.

 

Reviewer Responsibilities

1. Provide Objective, Constructive, and Timely Reviews

• Deliver a thorough, fair, and unbiased assessment of the manuscript’s content.
• Offer constructive criticism aimed at improving the clarity, quality, and impact of the work.
• Submit the review within the agreed deadline to avoid unnecessary delays in the editorial process.

 

2. Evaluate Core Academic Standards

• Assess the manuscript’s:
• Originality and novelty
• Theoretical and/or practical significance
• Methodological soundness and appropriateness
• Clarity of data presentation and interpretation
• Adherence to ethical research practices (including plagiarism, data fabrication, etc.)

 

3. Maintain Strict Confidentiality

• Treat all submitted materials as confidential documents.
• Do not disclose, discuss, or use any part of the manuscript content for personal or academic advantage.
• Never share the manuscript or review task with a third party without explicit permission from the editorial office.

 

4. Declare Conflicts of Interest

• Immediately inform the editorial team of any potential conflict of interest.
• Decline the review if impartiality cannot be guaranteed.

 

5. Refrain from Personal Criticism

• Provide professional and respectful feedback. Critique the work, not the author.
• Avoid derogatory or dismissive language, ensuring all feedback is academically grounded.

 

6. Uphold Ethical Standards

• Report suspected cases of:
• Duplicate publication
• Data manipulation or ethical misconduct
• Assist the editors in maintaining research integrity by highlighting any concerns observed.

 

7. Suggest Improvements and Further Literature (if applicable)

• Where necessary, recommend relevant literature that improves the manuscript’s quality — while avoiding excessive or self-serving citations.
• Advise on areas that need clarification, elaboration, or revision.

 

8. Engage Only Within Your Expertise

• Accept review assignments only when you are confident in your expertise on the manuscript’s subject matter.
• Notify the editor promptly if the manuscript falls outside your domain.

 

We appreciate the dedication and expertise of our reviewers in upholding the standard and reputation of Xpertno International Journal of Interdisciplinary Research. Thanks to all of them for your continued commitment.